Hurricane!

Is the Supreme Court's recent decision based on a logical fallacy?

The Supreme Court, the finest judicial minds in the nation, supposedly, have demanded the EPA supply them with a negative proof. Negative proof, of course, is a logical fallacy. In this case, the EPA is being asked to prove that it is impossible that ’greenhouse gasses’ contribute to climate change. Since proving something is impossible is, well, impossible, that makes it fairly difficult.